Connect with us

National

Supreme Court Hearing on Challenge to Places of Worship Act Rescheduled for April

Published

on

On Monday, the Supreme Court postponed the hearing on several cross-petitions concerning the constitutional validity of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, to April. The Act prohibits the filing of lawsuits to reclaim religious sites or alter their status as they existed on August 15, 1947. Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, who is leading a bench that includes Justice Sanjay Kumar, indicated that a three-judge panel would need to hear the matter due to the increasing number of petitions related to the Act.The current bench consists of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar, and Justice K.V. Viswanathan. During the initial part of the proceedings, senior advocate Indira Jaising brought up the issue of framing questions for adjudication. Chief Justice Khanna noted that the case wouldn’t be taken up that day because it required a three-judge bench, affirming that the hearing was tentatively scheduled for March.

Chief Justice Khanna also expressed concerns over the influx of intervention applications and similar writ petitions either challenging the 1991 law or requesting its effective implementation, suggesting that there should be limits on such filings. Later, the bench issued a short order dismissing all new petitions related to the case, but allowed those involved to raise new grounds in the ongoing proceedings.

In a previous hearing on December 12, 2024, the Supreme Court had instructed all courts nationwide to refrain from issuing any interim or final orders, including conducting surveys, regarding claims on existing religious structures. The bench had declared that no new lawsuits could be filed that assert claims over other religious sites while the court deliberates on cross-petitions questioning the constitutionality of Sections 3 and 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.

Entities including the Indian National Congress Party, CPI (ML), All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM) led by Asaduddin Owaisi, Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind, and the India Muslim Personal Law Board have filed applications opposing the petitions that challenge certain provisions of the 1991 Act and seeking its enforcement. Petitioners, including BJP leaders such as Subramanian Swamy and advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, contend that Sections 3 and 4 of the Act are unconstitutional, arguing that it infringes on the rights of Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs to reclaim their places of worship linked to their cultural heritage, as guaranteed by Article 29.

Opponents of the law argue that it violates the values of secularism and the rule of law, fundamental to the Constitution’s Preamble. Conversely, the Congress Party has defended the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, asserting that its preservation is crucial for maintaining India’s secular nature, and any changes could disrupt communal harmony and national integrity.

The Congress further highlighted that the Act reflects the will of the Indian populace, having been included in the party’s manifesto before the 1991 elections. They denounce the current challenge as a misguided attempt to undermine the principles of secularism.

Additionally, Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind, through its petition, seeks effective enforcement of the 1991 Act and adherence to the 2019 unanimous decision by the five-judge bench regarding the Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi – Babri Masjid case. They claim that Muslim sites are being subjected to baseless legal disputes, which are prohibited by the 1991 Act.

National

Cong Seeks Clarity on US President’s Role in India-Pakistan Ceasefire

Published

on

The Congress party reiterated its request for clarification from the government regarding US President Donald Trump’s repeated assertions about mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan.

Congress General Secretary for Communications Jairam Ramesh pointed out on platform X that “for the eighth time in eleven days,” President Trump has made the following claims: 1. He has taken full credit for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. 2. He praised the Prime Ministers of both countries equally, placing them on par. 3. He asserted that trade with the US was instrumental in achieving the ceasefire.

Continuing his claims, Trump attributed his personal diplomacy and ongoing trade agreements as key factors in de-escalating tensions between India and Pakistan. During a meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office on Wednesday, he stated, “If you look at what we did with Pakistan and India, we resolved that issue, and I think we resolved it through trade.”

Ramesh expressed concern that Prime Minister Modi and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar have remained silent regarding Trump’s repeated statements. He questioned, “Why this thundering silence?” while highlighting the lack of response from Jaishankar to remarks made by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

In response, Jaishankar clarified on Thursday that the cessation of hostilities was negotiated directly between India and Pakistan. He emphasized that India had made it clear to all nations, including the US, that Pakistan needed to approach India’s military leadership if it wished to stop the fighting.

In an interview with Nederlandse Omroep Stichting, Jaishankar acknowledged conversations with US officials, noting Rubio had spoken with him and Vice President Vance had spoken with Prime Minister Modi. He explained that it is normal for countries to reach out during conflicts, but stressed that the ceasefire was a direct result of negotiations between India and Pakistan.

Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri also stated on Monday that the US played no role in achieving the ceasefire, clarifying that it was prompted by a request from Pakistan’s Director-General of Military Operations to his counterpart in India. Misri reiterated that Pakistan sought the ceasefire following Indian strikes on military targets, including a China-made missile defense system in Lahore and the strategic Nur Khan air base.

Continue Reading

National

Kanimozhi Leads Delegation on Global Outreach Tour for Op Sindoor: 5-Nation Mission Kicks Off

Published

on

An all-party delegation led by Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi embarked on a five-nation tour on Thursday as part of India’s diplomatic outreach related to Operation Sindoor. The mission aims to highlight Pakistan-sponsored terrorism and promote global solidarity against it.

The delegation will visit Russia, Slovenia, Greece, Latvia, and Spain to emphasize India’s firm stance against terrorism in all its forms.

Ms. Kanimozhi stated that the primary goal of the visit is to communicate India’s united position on terrorism and counter the misinformation circulating worldwide. She remarked, “Our objective is to convey India’s message to various nations, explain the situation here, and help the world grasp the truth. We must address this issue together as a global community against terrorism.”

Highlighting the grave impact of terrorism, she added, “We lost 26 lives to terrorism, and it’s crucial to discuss the ongoing challenges we face because of it. The truth must be told.” She emphasized the importance of unity regarding the security and sovereignty of the nation, asserting that there is widespread agreement on this matter.

Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Prem Chand Gupta, part of the delegation, clarified, “The agenda is straightforward: we need to expose Pakistan’s deceptive propaganda.” Samajwadi Party MP Rajeev Rai noted that the goal is to isolate Pakistan, which supports terrorist activities against India. “We will bring to light incidents ranging from the Pahalgam attack to Operation Sindoor,” said Rai.

Aam Aadmi Party MP Ashok Kumar Mittal, also in the delegation, expressed confidence that the international community would stand in solidarity with India’s position.

Additionally, an all-party delegation led by Janata Dal (United) MP Sanjay Kumar Jha, and another by Shiv Sena MP Shrikant Shinde, began their respective five-nation tours on Wednesday. Sanjay Jha’s delegation is traveling to Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea, Japan, and Singapore, while Shrikant Shinde’s group is visiting the UAE, Liberia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sierra Leone.

Continue Reading

National

Crossing Boundaries: Supreme Court Criticizes Central Probe Agency, Halts TASMAC Money Laundering Investigation

Published

on

On Thursday, the Supreme Court criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for its raids at the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) concerning an alleged liquor scam. The court remarked that the central investigative agency was overstepping its bounds and disrupting the country’s federal structure.

During the hearing of a petition from the State of Tamil Nadu and TASMAC contesting the Madras High Court’s decision to dismiss their challenge against the ED’s searches, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice AG Masih questioned, “How can there be an offense against the corporation?”

“You are crossing all limits,” CJI Gavai said to Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, who represented the ED.

The bench also issued a notice to the ED and temporarily halted the money laundering investigation against TASMAC. “In the meantime, there shall be a stay of further proceedings concerning the petitioners,” the bench stated.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the State of Tamil Nadu, pointed out that the state had already filed 41 FIRs against liquor outlets on corruption charges between 2014 and 2021. The ED initiated its investigation in 2025, leading to the recent raids.

In response, the bench inquired of ASG Raju why the ED felt the need to intervene when the state had already been taking action. Raju claimed the ED was investigating a significant fraud and suggested that politicians were receiving undue protection. The case involves an alleged scam of ₹1000 crore in TASMAC. Earlier this March, the ED conducted raids at the headquarters of the state-run corporation, confiscating phones and devices belonging to its officials.

Continue Reading

Trending